
Men
The Polar Bears fell 5-3 to New England Small College Athletic Conference rival Williams in the rubber match of their season series.
The Ephs advanced to take on Emory Tuesday in the semifinals.
Bowdoin (15-8) split the first two doubles results, with Casey Grindon and Chris Lord earning a point for the Polar Bears with an 8-5 victory at No. 3 doubles, while Williams won at No. 2.
At No. 1 doubles, Bowdoin’s Oscar Pena and Sam King earned a 9-8 victory over Williams’ top pair of Bryan Chow and Trey Meyer, taking the tiebreaker 7-3 to give Bowdoin a 2-1 lead heading to singles.

Williams won in straight sets in three matches, while Pena and Lord both dropped three-setters.
King and Pena have qualified for the individual Division III doubles championship that begins on today.
The Polar Bears fell behind, 2-1, after doubles play, with Emory taking three of the four completed singles matches for a 5-2 win, ending Bowdoin’s season with a 13-9 mark.
After dropping the No. 1 doubles match, 8-0, Bowdoin rallied to tie the match the No. 3 doubles team of Kate Winingham and Emily Lombardi won 8-1.
At No. 2 doubles, Emma Chow and Chantalle Lavertu were tied with Emory’s Malavika Padmanabhan and Brenna Kelly, 5-5, but lost three of the four games for an 8-6 setback.
Emory’s Gabrielle Clark defeated Bowdoin’s Kellen Alberstone at No. 1 singles, 6- 0, 6-0, and the Polar Bears fell behind 4-1 after Zahra Dawson defeated Lavertu on No. 3 singles, 6-2, 6-2.
Bowdoin’s Emma Lewis closed the gap to 4-2 with a 6- 3, 6-1 win at No. 4 singles, but Kelly won at No. 5 singles (6-1, 6-1) to close out the victory for Emory.

Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less