
PORTLAND
Pop artist Robert Indiana, best known for his 1960s “LOVE” series, died at his secluded island home off the Maine coast having never found the type of lasting love that was celebrated by thousands through his iconic work.
The artist’s endearing image of LOVE is instantly recognizable around the world. Couples have their photo taken at the LOVE sculpture in Philadelphia, and the iconic image was used on postage stamps.
But the man behind the art grew up in a household where the word “love” was never spoken, and he never found a lasting relationship, said Barbara Haskell, curator of the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York.
“The word was never used in his family growing up,” she said. “He had a complicated relationship with the word.”
Indiana died Saturday from respiratory failure at his home in a converted Odd Fellows Hall, a fraternal order lodge, on Vinalhaven Island, 15 miles off the mainland, said James Brannan, his attorney. He was 89.

Friends had expressed concern for his well-being because the reclusive artist had not been heard from for some time.
A lawsuit filed in New York City the day before his death suggested he was purposefully isolated by his caretakers.
Brannan declined to comment on the situation.
Indiana created a lifetime of art but he’s best known for LOVE, spelled with two letters to a line and with a tilted “O.” It’s been transformed into sculptures around the world, sometimes in different languages, from Spain to Israel to Japan.
“In some ways he was perhaps seen as the proverbial one-hit wonder because ‘LOVE’ was so immensely iconic and immensely huge in pop culture,” said Dan Mills, the director at Bates College Museum of Art. “For better or for worse, it overshadowed some of his other contributions.”
Haskell compared the image to “American Gothic,” the painting by Grant Wood of a man with a pitchfork and a woman in front of a farmhouse. The public knows those images even if they don’t know the creators, she noted.
Indiana, who was born Robert Clark in the state of Indiana, left behind the art scene in New York and retreated in 1978 to Maine, living on Vinalhaven.
He told The Associated Press in 2009 that he moved to his house — which a benefactor bought for him — when he needed a place to go after his lease ran out on his five-story studio and gallery in the Bowery section of New York City.
His desire for solitude was legendary.
In 2014, he disappointed dozens of fans by failing to make an appearance outside his home for an event dubbed International HOPE Day, which was inspired by his creativity.
Some of his long-time friends became worried about him in recent months.
Kathleen Rogers, a friend and former publicist, said she was so concerned that six to eight weeks ago she contacted the Maine Department of Health and Human Services to investigate.
She said she wants him to be remembered as an eccentric and inspiring artist, not as a man who shut out friends and closed off his studio.
“He was reclusive, cantankerous and sometimes difficult. But he was a very loyal, loving man. He was the architect of love,” she said.
A DHHS spokeswoman did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
Although his iconic “LOVE” tended to overshadow everything else, he never stopped producing art. That included fashioning a “HOPE” design, similar to “LOVE,” in honor of former President Barack Obama.
The Whitney Museum of American Art staged a 2013 exhibit, “Robert Indiana: Beyond Love.” In Maine, Mills was inspired by the Whitney’s exhibition to produce a 2016 exhibition, “Robert Indiana: Now and Then.”
In the end, Indiana found love through his art and adoration from the public. But real love, Indiana recognized, was a “dangerous commodity” that can die out and lead to disappointment, Haskell said.
“On one hand he accepted that love became a symbol that brought him international renown,” she said. “But for him love also has this element of fragility and precariousness.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less