The Bowdoin College men’s soccer team came up just short in its bid for its third consecutive New England Small College Athletic Conference title last fall, dropping to eventual conference champ Amherst 2-1 in the semifinals of the league tournament.
The Polar Bears finished the regular season strong, going 4-0-2 down the stretch, including back-to-back wins over eventual national champion Tufts in late October. Bowdoin finished 9-4-4 overall.
Last year, Bowdoin ranked third in the NESCAC with a stingy 0.82 goals against average and, prior to an injury that shortened his campaign, goaltender Stevie Van Siclen led the conference by allowing just six goals in 10 games played (0.66 GAA). He returns to backline a Bowdoin unit that also includes All- NESCAC performer Matty McColl.
Moctar Niang leads a Polar Bear attack that will feature nine players who scored goals last autumn.
The schedule sees the Polar Bears on the road for the first three games, including an early road test at 10thranked Amherst (Sept. 9).
Bowdoin opens its home campaign with a pair of league contests in consecutive days against Wesleyan (Sept. 16) and Williams (Sept. 17). Other home games include Middlebury (Sept. 23), Southern Maine (Sept. 24), Hamilton (Oct. 14) and Colby (Oct. 17).
The Polar Bears are coached by Scott Wiercinski, with Van Siclen and Sam Ward serving as the team’s captains.

Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less