We are writing in support of Ranked Choice Voting, Question 5 on the November ballot, a simple common-sense reform to our voting system that puts power back in the hands of voters to restore majority rule and give voters more voice in our democracy.
In nine of the last 11 races for Maine’s governor, candidates were elected by less than half of voters. In five of these races, candidates were elected by less than 40 percent of voters. In a representative democracy, our leaders should be elected by more than half of us, so they represent the people and are accountable to us, not narrow political factions.
Ranked Choice Voting gives voters more voice and more choice in elections. If your favorite candidate can’t win, your vote is instantly counted for your second choice, so you never feel like your vote is wasted. With Ranked Choice Voting, you never have to vote for the lesser of two evils when there is another candidate you really like.
73,000 Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Greens and Libertarians across Maine signed petitions circulated by 900 volunteers to place this nonpartisan initiative on the November ballot. Please talk to friends and family about what Ranked Choice Voting is and why it matters.
We encourage readers to learn more about this movement at YesOn5.me, and join us in voting “Yes” on Question 5 on Nov. 8.
Mary Johnson
Bill Johnson
Saco
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less