I am writing in support of Question 5 on Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), a common-sense reform to our voting system that gives power back to the voters and makes politicians more accountable.
The RCV process is simple: when voting, you get to rank candidates running for an office in order of your individual preference. All first-choice rankings are tallied, and if no candidate meets the 50 percent plus one threshold, the last-place candidate is eliminated, and their supporters have their next choices activated and assigned among the remaining candidates. This process continues until one candidate emerges with a majority of support.
There have been a lot of comments this election season, from both conservatives and liberals, to “vote your conscience.” This system allows you to do that without fear and without feeling like your vote was wasted.
Because Maine has a history of several strong candidates running for office, many elections are decided by a plurality of votes, rather than a majority. The winners in nine of the last 11 gubernatorial elections did not receive a majority. Because of this, the League of Women Voters of Maine convened a study in 2008 to consider alternative voting systems, and in 2011, endorsed RCV as the best system
Though skeptics believe it would be too difficult to implement, Portland has successfully implemented RCV for its local elections. What better way to use our “as Maine goes, so goes the nation” influence to champion this system? It will be a long road to RCV for larger contests, the presidency especially, but there is no place like Maine to start that transition.
To learn more about this nonpartisan initiative, visit lwvme.org/RCV.html.
Abigail Cioffi
Biddeford
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less