At the July 5, 2016, Biddeford City Council meeting, it was announced that Biddeford has a $1.1 million surplus from the last budget cycle and that the City Council is looking at spending $350,000 of this surplus on a variety of city projects. This raises a variety of questions:
• Why was the budgeting process so “off ” that they now have $1.1 million of extra taxpayer money at the end of the year?
• The City Council is looking at putting the remaining $750,000 into the city fund balance. Why was the city trying to act on such a large item without consulting the public?
• How did these items get on the agenda for the City Council to act on without a discussion with the public? You would hope that an item of this magnitude would be discussed with the taxpayers before taking action on it.
• If these items would have been approved at the July 5 meeting, the public would have no way to publicly comment because of the removal of the Public Addressing the Council portion of City Council meetings. Why hasn’t this been reinstated?
• What is the return on investment of the proposed $350,000 worth of projects?
The city has scheduled a special council meeting on Wednesday, July 13, at 7 p.m. in council chambers (at City Hall). Please attend this meeting to let your councilors know how you feel your tax dollars should be spent. If you can’t make the meeting, please e-mail or call your city councilor to let them know your thoughts.
Brian Cote
Biddeford
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less