Cameron announced his resignation last month because he backed the losing side in a referendum for Britain to leave the European Union. So did May – but infighting, bad timing and cold feet among leaders of the victorious “leave” campaign means that she will have the task of leading a divided country out of the EU.
The latest chapter in the political turmoil spawned by the EU vote moved with breathtaking speed.
On Monday morning, there were two candidates to lead the governing Conservative Party. At noon, Andrea Leadsom stepped down, making May leader-in-waiting.
By late afternoon, Cameron had announced that May would be moving into 10 Downing Street within 48 hours.
“We will have a new prime minister in that building behind me by Wednesday evening,” Cameron said in a brief statement outside the leader’s official London residence.
Cameron, who has governed since May 2010, said he would offer his resignation to Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace on Wednesday after attending a final session of Prime Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons.
The monarch will then invite May – as leader of a party with a majority in Parliament – to lead a new government.
Speaking outside Parliament surrounded by Conservative colleagues, May said she was “honored and humbled” to have been chosen the party’s new leader.
May campaigned tepidly to remain in the EU, but sought to reassure those who voted “leave” that she would respect their decision. She said there would be no attempt to avoid a British exit from the bloc.
“Brexit means Brexit, and we’re going to make a success of it,” she said, promising to deliver “a strong, new positive vision for the future of our country.”
May’s sudden victory came when Leadsom, the energy minister, stepped down from the Conservative leadership race after a weekend furor over comments in which she appeared to say being a mother gave her an advantage over May, who has no children.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less