From Staff Reports
SANFORD — The Sanford baseball team held a 3-2 lead after five innings on Thursday, but the visiting Scarborough Red Storm were able to rally to pick up an 8-3 victory at Goodall Park.
The host Spartans got five strong innings from starter Mike Ravesi, who finished with five strikeouts and allowed just two hits, but he would be forced to give up the ball after throwing nearly 100 pitches.
“I give props to my pitcher, Mike Ravesi, who pitched a very strong five innings. He threw 97 pitches, so that was enough,” said Sanford coach Mark Boissonneault.
Scarborough would take advantage as the Red Storm had a runner reach on an error, a walk and a hit-by-pitch and a bases-clearing triple would give them the lead.
The Red Storm would score six runs in the sixth inning to take control and the Spartans were unable to bounce back.
“Defensively, we had a couple little errors and one really hurt,” said Boissonneault.
Scarborough’s Mitchell Wedge went six strong innings and held the Spartans to just three hits.
“We just couldn’t push across a couple runs. We needed a couple more runs to solidify things,” said Boissonneault.
Sanford was led by Tylar Burgess with two hits and Frankie Veino with a double. James Roche chipped in with an RBI on a sacrifice fly.
The Spartans, who dropped to 0-2 on the young season, will visit South Portland on Tuesday.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less