Revenue hit $1.6 billion for the family-owned company’s fiscal year that ended Feb. 28, CEO Steve Smith told workers in a memo. The disappointing news that the company missed its growth goals came after five consecutive years of sales growth.
The 104-year-old company in Freeport “performed well given a challenging retail environment,” Smith said Friday in a statement.
Warm weather in the critical fourth quarter was particularly tough on apparel retailers, and many of them resorted to steep discounts on winter clothing.
“The fact that L.L. Bean is even with where they were last year is a strong result compared to many of their peers,” said Dan Hess, CEO of Merchant Forecast, a New York-based independent research firm. “Flat is good in this environment.”
Despite missing sales targets, the board approved a modest bonus for its 5,900 year-round workers. The bonus amounts to 3 percent of wages, or about $1,000 for the typical full-time, hourly worker, said company spokeswoman Carolyn Beem.
Smith told workers that the company has no plans to back away from investments in 2016 on business transformation efforts, including retail expansion and web development. The company is in the midst of a $150 million, multi-year investment, Beem said.
Last year, the company announced plans to more than triple the number of retail stores, with a goal of reaching 100 stores within five years, and that effort remains on track, Beem said.
Stores opened in 2015 in Cleveland; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Virginia; and Leawood, Kansas. Store openings will accelerate starting in 2016, she added.
The past year was a time of big change at Bean. Smith, whose hiring was announced in November, is the first person from outside the company to be hired as CEO. The year also marked the passing of Leon Leonwood Bean’s grandson, former president, CEO and chairman emeritus Leon Gorman.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less