PORTLAND
A Maine man serving a life sentence for murder in the death of a 12-year-old girl cannot be excluded as the source of DNA found on the girl’s T- shirt and scarf, a DNA expert testified Thursday.
Dennis Dechaine is seeking a new trial based on new analysis of DNA evidence. Dechaine has maintained his innocence since he was convicted in the 1988 murder of Sarah Cherry, whose body was found in Bowdoin two days after she went missing while baby-sitting.
At Thursday’s hearing before Justice Carl Bradford, who presided over Dechaine’s 1989 trial, the former laboratory director at the company that analyzed the DNA said that male DNA was found on Sarah’s T-shirt and scarf. Testing could not show who the DNA came from, but it did not exclude Dechaine as the source, Rick Staub said.
Testing on the girl’s bra was inconclusive, he said.
Staub was one of two defense witnesses to testify Thursday. Testimony is scheduled to conclude Friday.
For years, Dechaine has had a large following of supporters who are convinced of his innocence.
But the victim’s family is convinced of his guilt. Sarah’s mother, Debbie Crosman, said outside of court that she and other family members have attended virtually all of Dechaine’s many court hearings over the years. She relives her daughter’s death at each hearing, she said.
“I get angry again,” she said. “And I don’t like getting angry. That’s not me.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less