FREEPORT
After wading through extended public comment and legal considerations, Town councilors Tuesday approved an amended parking ordinance that mixed and matched language from three separate studies.
Freeport’s baseline ordinance requires 6.7 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of an establishment’s business space.
However, some businesses are exempt, or “grandfathered,” from the parking requirements because they were established prior to the town’s 1976 ordinance governing parking. The effect of the grandfathering is that a multitude of small businesses essentially have provided the parking requirements for Freeport’s older, larger retailers.
The most substantive of Tuesday’s amendments will reduce parking requirements by 50 percent for basement or second-floor-level businesses. Also eliminated is parking required by business floorspace that is restroom, if that restroom is open to the general public.
Studies were conducted by the town’s Planning Board and Traffic and Parking Committee, as well as a Massachusetts engineering firm. The consultant suggested eliminating the grandfathered clauses, which would be illegal under state law and Freeport’s town charter.
An initial amendment offered by councilor Rich DeGrandpre replaced a Planning Board’s recommendation for residential parking requirements with one suggested by the Traffic and Parking Committee. The amendment, which passed 4-2 with councilors Sarah Tracy and Andrew Wellen opposed, changed apartment requirements to one parking space for a single bedroom unit, 1.75 spaces for a two-bedroom, and 2 spaces for a three-bedroom.
An additional half-space would be required for apartments beyond three bedrooms.
Final vote on the amendments was 4-2, with councilors Wellen and Melanie Sachs opposed.
jtleonard@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less