Without knowing the background, there is no apparent reason to object to a bill in the Legislature that would give local school districts more freedom to choose the textbooks they use.
Unless you remember that the sponsor of House Bill 116, Rep. Frank Hoffman, R-West Monroe, has a history of opposition to standard science textbooks.
Hoffman was among the legislators and critics of evolution who tried to block adoption of standard biology textbooks in 2010. Fortunately, a committee that included responsible educators refused to go along with the objections raised by Hoffman and extremely conservative religious groups. The state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education backed the experts, despite political pressure from the Louisiana Family Forum, closely allied to Gov. Bobby Jindal.
These latter-day flat-earthers push “alternatives” to evolution — a thinly veiled effort to introduce into public-school classrooms, and substitute for evolutionary science’s discoveries, the Bible’s story of Genesis.
Thus, Hoffman’s bill is not, as he said, about “autonomy for the local school systems.” It is about subverting expert review to allow alternative texts, which we believe will set science education back in this state.
Hoffman said a state-recommended textbook list still will be developed, and he said he expects 98 percent of books to be taken from that list.
But those few exceptions allowed by the Hoffman bill could leave Louisiana children with the mistaken impression that the Earth is only about 6,000 years old.
We urge lawmakers to reject the Hoffman bill and other efforts to push political and religious agendas in science education.
— The Advocate of Baton Rouge (La.)
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less