The NHL has kicked the ball back to the players’ association in the form of another counteroffer as the sides play pingpong in the search for labor peace.
The proposal was presented Tuesday night in a 30-minute meeting that was long delayed as the league worked on its response to the union’s counteroffer Monday. The NHL started this latest round of talks with a contract offer late last week.
That spurred negotiations to resume Monday after the sides spent nearly three weeks apart. They were back together throughout Tuesday in smaller groups before the main negotiating teams met briefly at night when the NHL made its new offer.
“They did make a comprehensive response to what we gave them,” players’ association executive director Donald Fehr said. “We asked a couple of questions. Now what we have to do is go through the document, try to make some sense out of it, compare it and see what the appropriate thing is to do next.”
After reviewing the document later Tuesday night, Fehr planned to get back in touch with the NHL on this morning and expected to meet with the league for a third straight day.
“I am reasonably certain of it,” Fehr said.
NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman declined to provide details of the league’s latest offer, but said it addressed specific areas the union requested.
“There were certain things that the players’ association asked for that we agreed to, there were some things that we moved in their direction, and there were other things that we said no,” he said. “That’s part of the process.”
But it’s a process that has limited time to be completed. Bettman said Monday the NHL has told the union a deal needs to be in place by Jan. 11 so a 48-game season can begin eight days later.
It is unclear how many issues still need to be resolved and how far apart the sides are in key areas.
“Nobody is counting,” Bettman said. “We’re not trying to keep score, we’re trying to get an agreement.”
Both sides agreed that it is a positive sign they are getting into a rhythm of talking and meeting and exchanging ideas on a regular basis.
“It is better to be meeting than not. I am not saying anything more about it,” Fehr said.
The only way to bridge the gaps to a deal that would save the season is to keep working at it together.
“The fact that we’re involved in a continuous process is something that I am glad to see, but we’re clearly not done yet,” Bettman said. “It’s up to the players’ association to come back to us now in response to what they have been given this evening.”
Small groups from each side met and conferred by conference calls all afternoon about provisions of a potential collective bargaining agreement. A full meeting of the negotiating teams didn’t begin until 9 p.m. and wrapped up relatively quickly after the NHL presented its counterproposal.
The afternoon sessions were more for informational purposes.
“Those were more technical,” Bettman said. “There were a variety of issues where there weren’t what I would call negotiations. It was understanding what each side was looking for, explaining what the issues were that were being discussed just to make sure there was a common understanding.”
There is a little less than two weeks left to reach an agreement and hold one week of training camp before starting the season. All games through Jan. 14 have been canceled, claiming more than 50 percent of the original schedule.
The NHL is the only North American professional sports league to cancel a season because of a labor dispute, losing the 2004-05 campaign to a lockout. A 48-game season was played in 1995 after a lockout stretched into January.
The NHL was supposed to be celebrating its annual outdoor Winter Classic between the Toronto Maple Leafs and Detroit Red Wings on Tuesday — the 108th day of the lockout — at Michigan Stadium.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less