BATH — An effort by Illinois Congressman Mike Quigley late Wednesday night amend a major defense appropriations bill — and cut nearly $1 billion from the DDG 51 program — was defeated thanks in large part to the work of Congresswoman Chellie Pingree, D-Maine.
Today, Bath Iron Works lauded Pingree’s efforts in helping to lead an effort to defeat a vote that would have eliminated funding for the Arelgih Burke-class destroyer.
In a release today, Pingree said Quigley introduced an amendment to the defense appropriations bill that would have cut nearly $1 billion — and eliminated an entire ship — from the DDG 51 program.
“This was a last-minute attempt to sneak in and cut funding for a DDG-51 and that could have had some pretty dire consequences for Bath Iron Works,” Pingree said in the release. “But these ships are the workhorses for the Navy, they are a key part of our military strategy and BIW is getting them to the Navy on time and on budget. I think in the end we convinced my colleagues that it didn’t make sense from a strategic or a fiscal point of view to cut this ship.”
Quigley’s amendment was defeated by a vote of 60-359, according to Pingree.
In a statement Thursday afternoon, BIW spokesman Jim DeMartini said, “The Navy’s plan for meeting its national defense obligations is based on full funding for the DDG 51 program. The Maine delegation has always demonstrated an ability to balance budget pressures with the need for affordable shipbuilding capability to provide the Navy with the ships it needs. Congresswoman Pingree’s leadership in defeating last night’s attempt to reduce DDG 51 Program funding in the 2013 House Defense Appropriations Bill exemplifies this leadership and commitment.”
bbrogan@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less