To the editor:
The Legislature on Feb. 23 cast the final votes necessary to enact a bipartisan solution to the 2012 budget shortfall at the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Casting my vote in favor of this budget was one of the toughest decisions I have ever had to make. Nobody enjoys cutting services to thousands of Mainers, but upon reflection of the numbers and the budget history at DHHS, I felt that we needed to do something to address the growth of our public health insurance program.
MaineCare (Maine’s Medicaid program) has grown by 45 percent in just the past 10 years, with enrollment expanding by 78 percent during the same time.
DHHS has gone over budget by tens of millions of dollars every year for almost a decade.
Our Medicaid program is among the most generous in the nation. With 27 percent of Maine’s population on Medicaid, we rank third in the nation for enrollment. Our Medicaid spending per capita ranks fourth.
Our tax burden ranks similarly high. I soon realized which way the budget needed to go.
Additionally, the supplemental budget passed on Feb. 23 staves off near-term disaster. It ensures that medical providers will keep getting paid and patients will keep getting care through the end of the fiscal year, and that our local hospitals will retain vital federal matching funds.
We now face the task of crafting a solution to the 2013 budget shortfall. I am confident that the Legislature will strike a good balance, once again, between preserving care for those who need it and trimming costs where we can.
Rep. Kimberly Olsen,
Phippsburg
letters@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less