
Chief Constable Peter Fahy told a news conference that Fiona Bone, 32 — who was in the process of planning her wedding — and Nicola Hughes, 23, died shortly after the gunman opened fire and set off a grenade in Hattersley, a suburban area about 10 miles from central Manchester.
He said that Dale Cregan, 29, the focus of an intense police manhunt as a suspect in two murders last month, surrendered at a local police station shortly after the incident and was booked on suspicion of murder.
Fahy said that Cregan, or an associate, had telephoned police reporting a burglary Tuesday morning and the two officers responded. “When they arrived, it appears then that Cregan emerged into the road and killed these two officers,” Fahy said, adding that the man’s motive was “impossible to fathom.”
Fatal gun attacks on police are a rarity in Britain, where firearms are tightly controlled and few officers carry deadly weapons. Britain’s Home Office said it doesn’t compile figures on the number of officers killed in the line of duty, but the Police Roll of Honor Trust, which tracks such incidents, counts only one deadly shooting against an officer in the past three years.
By contrast, 55 U.S. law enforcement officers were shot to death in 2010 alone, according to FBI figures.
Prime Minister David Cameron called the Manchester shootings “a shocking reminder of the debt we owe to those who put themselves in danger to keep us safe and secure,” while Scotland Yard chief Bernard Hogan-Howe described the incident as a “horrific attack.”
Deadly gun attacks by criminals or terrorists occasionally lead to calls for more armed police, but Fahy batted those away Tuesday.
“We are passionate that the British style of policing is routinely unarmed policing,” Fahy said. “We know from the experience in America and other countries that having armed officers certainly does not mean, sadly, that police officers do not end up getting shot dead.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less