
ALFRED – A former Massachusetts priest found guilty of sexually abusing a young altar boy on trips to Maine in the late 1980s has been scheduled to be sentenced on March 5.
Ronald Paquin, 76, was convicted on 11 of 24 counts of gross sexual misconduct at York County Superior Court on Nov. 28.
Keith Townsend, 44, of Seabrook, New Hampshire, the victim in the incidents related to the charges, has spoken publicly about the abuse. Townsend testified in court in November that Paquin befriended him by giving him alcohol and letting him drive his car without a license, according to the Portland Press Herald.
Townsend said the first incident of sexual abuse occurred when he was 8 or 9 years old, and he was repeatedly sexually abused by Paquin during trips with the then priest to a Kennebunkport campground where Paquin had a trailer, according to the Portland Press Herald.
Paquin was found not guilty of similar charges related to a second boy, now an adult, who also testified in November.
Paquin was a central figure in the Boston Globe “Spotlight” investigation of clergy sexual abuse. He pleaded guilty in 2002 to three counts of raping a Haverhill, Massachusetts, altar boy and spent about a decade in jail on those charges.
Paquin was removed from priesthood by the Catholic Church in 2000, after the Boston Archdiocese received at least 18 complaints over two decades that he had sexually abused boys, according to the Boston Globe.
Paquin could face many years of jail time as well as fines from the recent conviction. He is currently scheduled to be sentenced at York County Superior Court on March 5, with a time tentatively set at 1 p.m., according to the court clerk’s office.
Paquin is being held at York County Jail.
— Staff Writer Liz Gotthelf can be contacted at 780-9015 or egotthelf@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less