
AUGUSTA —On Tuesday, the Maine House of Representatives voted unanimously to support State Sen. Justin Chenette’s, D-Saco, bill LD 256, “An Act To Ban the Use of Leadership Political Action Committees for Personal Profit.”
The Senate voted unanimously to approve the measure last week.
This bill would prevent legislators and candidates from profiting off political contributions by using political action committees (PACs) to loan their private business money. It also would bar individuals from commingling personal and PAC funds to avoid possible misuse.
“Every single Democrat, Republican, and Independent spoke loud and clear that closing this campaign finance loophole is the right thing to do,” said Chenette. “Mainers deserve a political system that benefits the public good rather than coating the lines of insiders’ pockets.”
LD 256 faces additional votes and then awaits approval from Gov. Janet Mills before it can be enacted into law.
This bill is also a part of larger campaign finance reform package from Sen. Chenette. LD 76, “An Act To Strengthen the Integrity of the Legislature by Extending the Waiting Period before Legislators May Engage in Any Amount of Compensated Lobbying,” and LD 54, “An Act To Limit the Influence of Lobbyists by Expanding the Prohibition on Accepting Political Contributions,” have received support in committee and are expected to come to the Senate floor for a vote.
Chenette is a member of the Senate Ethics Committee.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less