The Day (Conn.), March 6: While Americans have been fixated on their prolonged and bizarre presidential race, scant attention has been played to an alarming development across the Atlantic Ocean – the potential disintegration of the European Union.
Voters in Britain will go to the polls June 23 to decide whether to exit the EU, a movement labeled Brexit. Exiting would be a major blow to Britain and the 28-nation union that formed at the end of the 20th century.
The EU’s loose politico-economic alliance that has led to common ground rules on trade, monetary policy and environmental regulation, has served as perhaps the greatest bulwark against a return of the divisions and national rivalries that led to two world wars in the prior century.
British Prime Minister David Cameron, to assuage the nationalistic elements within his Conservative Party, sought to put the calls for leaving the EU behind him by agreeing to a referendum. Cameron fully expected its rejection, and he is campaigning against Brexit. But polls show Brits – frustrated by a sluggish economy, the problem of immigration from the Middle East and Northern Africa, and influenced by those contending the nation would be better going it alone – split evenly over whether to stay or go.
It is difficult to see how Brexit works well for Britain, for Europe and therefore for the West, including the United States. Removing the world’s fifth-largest economy from the EU would create economic instability at a time when the global economy is shaky.
Britain would still have to trade with its old union partners, but would have lost the ability to help set the rules. With the counterweight Britain and France have provided diminished, Germany’s economic dominance of the EU would grow.
Brexit would diminish the ability of the continent to deal in a united fashion with issues such as the immigration crisis, economic downturns and health outbreaks. Brexit could also lead to other nations looking for their own exit.
Stability is the better option. But as with the presidential election in the United States, emotion and frustration are driving a segment of the British electorate, rather than pragmatism and a cleared-eyed view of reality.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less