The Republican (Conn.), March 8: The right to privacy, as we know it, was born late in the 19th century. Will we let it die in the early years of the 21st?
There’s been much focus of late on a particular iPhone. The one in question: a device used by one of the shooters in the terrorist massacre in San Bernardino, California, late last year. Authorities have ordered Apple to create an operating system that would allow investigators to break into the device without it self-destructing. Apple is fighting the order.
But this story is about so much more than a single iPhone. It’s about each individual’s fundamental right to privacy. It’s important never to forget that, because the feds want the focus to be on fear, on terrorists, on keeping the citizens safe.
It’s also important to remember that the feds were opposed to strong encryption well before San Bernardino. They hate the idea that people can hold in their hand an electronic device containing data that they cannot access.
Just as so many people cherish their privacy.
In the earliest days of our nation, the battle was between liberty and security, not privacy and security. The focus on privacy came about, at least in part, because of emerging technologies, particularly photography and the telephone.
Photographs taken surreptitiously and then published in newspaper gossip columns were intruding into people’s lives. A seminal 1890 article in The Harvard Law Review, written by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, compellingly made the case that the right to privacy, at its core, is a “right to be let alone.”
This piece, and its thinking, became the basis for many legal decisions to follow, including cases on wiretapping and surveillance.
All of which is to say that the case of the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone is so much greater than is often portrayed. Officials have admitted that if they are given access to that particular phone, there are many, many others in their possession that they’d like to peruse.
Eventually, of course, the phones of ordinary people would no longer be safe. If you believe that your business is your business, that you possess, as an American citizen, a fundamental right to be let alone, then you’ve got a dog in this fight.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less