
North and South were happy at the end of this deal. Look only at the North hand. Your partner opens one heart, you respond one spade, he rebids two diamonds, and you jump to three no-trump, thinking that will end the auction. But no, partner raises to four no-trump. Do you feel called upon to do anything now?
Note that four no-trump was not asking for aces. If South were that strong, he would not have rebid a nonforcing two diamonds. Four no-trump was quantitative, indicating some 16 or 17 points.
Then perhaps you will think that with only 13 points, you do not have the values for a slam. However, you have two aces, the heart king, and three 10s – all excellent cards. So David Bakhshi from England jumped to six hearts. This showed high-honor-doubleton in hearts, because with three, North would have supported that suit earlier. Andrew McIntosh (South) passed with such strong hearts.
They had reached a fair slam that got better when West did not lead a spade. He chose instead the club seven. South won with dummy’s queen and took the diamond finesse. When it won, declarer cashed his diamond ace and ruffed a diamond with the heart nine. East overruffed with the 10 and returned a trump to stop a second diamond ruff. South returned to his hand with a club, drew trumps, crossed to dummy with a spade, and cashed the club ace. When the jack dropped, declarer claimed these 12 tricks: one spade, five hearts, two diamonds and four clubs.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less