4 min read

Ray Cote, business agent for the Teamsters Local 340 labor union, front right, leads dozens in a chant, shouting, “What do we want? Contracts! When do we want them? Now!” at a Biddeford City Council meeting Tuesday night.
Ray Cote, business agent for the Teamsters Local 340 labor union, front right, leads dozens in a chant, shouting, “What do we want? Contracts! When do we want them? Now!” at a Biddeford City Council meeting Tuesday night.
BIDDEFORD — A City Council meeting was adjourned after only a few minutes Tuesday night, when members of the labor unions representing Biddeford’s police officers, firefighters and public works employees refused to leave the council chambers.

City officials warned the dozens of people assembled – who had turned out to protest contracts proposed by the city that include cuts to their benefits – that if some of them did not move into the hallway, the meeting could not proceed because the dense crowd violated the building’s fire code. When crowd members responded by chanting, “Shut it down!” the council did just that.

Above: Protesters march outside of Biddeford City Hall Tuesday, upset over the city’s recent proposal to cut benefits for its police officers, firefighters and public works employees.
Above: Protesters march outside of Biddeford City Hall Tuesday, upset over the city’s recent proposal to cut benefits for its police officers, firefighters and public works employees.
Council Chair John McCurry made the motion to adjourn the meeting, which was approved by a 6-3 vote; Councilors Robert Quattrone, Michael Ready and Bob Mills opposed the decision.

Biddeford Mayor Alan Casavant, left, speaks with the media following a City Council meeting Tuesday night.
Biddeford Mayor Alan Casavant, left, speaks with the media following a City Council meeting Tuesday night.
“It’s disturbing to see that any time there’s any type of controversy the first thing that happens is a motion to adjourn,” Mills said as he left City Hall. “We had business to conduct, and just adjourning a meeting (because) of people who are visibly upset about the police contracts, the fire contracts, the public works contracts … it’s just very disturbing to me.”

With the contracts of Biddeford’s public safety and public works employees having expired on June 30, the city is now seeking new contracts for them that include benefit cuts, such as the removal of retiree health insurance, a reduction in sick days – from 12 to six per year – and the elimination of accrued unused sick time.

Advertisement

Sgt. Philip Greenwood, chief steward of the union representing Biddeford’s police officers, said Monday that the city’s proposal is “a straight-up slap in (the) face, an insult,” especially considering that the city’s public safety and public works employees have asked for nothing more than “cost-of-living” increases over the last decade or so. But Michael Wing, the city’s negotiator, maintains Biddeford has for years been granting those employees more benefits than what is typical in the municipal sector.

“The city is concerned about retiree health insurance, excess sick leave accumulation and other employee benefits that are in excess of industry standards,” Wing wrote in an email Monday. “Maintaining these benefits at their present levels is an unfair burden which the taxpayers of Biddeford cannot afford.”

After Tuesday night’s short-lived meeting, Mayor Alan Casavant relayed a point similar to Wing’s, saying the city “just wants to have contracts that are fair,” with respect to city employees but also to the taxpayers.

Casavant also said he was displeased with the actions of the protesters – who before the meeting marched outside of City Hall with signs reading, “City of Biddeford unfair to Teamsters Local 340,” while loudly chanting, “What do we want? Contracts! When do we want them? Now!” The crowd later chanted the same words from inside the council chambers.

“I fully understand the frustration that they have,” said Casavant. “But I think that we also have to be allowed to conduct our city business, so their refusal to leave the room when it was clearly over capacity was problematic.”

On the other hand, Ray Cote, business agent for the Teamsters Local 340 labor union, said after the meeting that he believes the council could have gone on with the meeting but instead “took the easy way out” by ending it. Still, Cote said he felt the turnout of a large, rambunctious crowd sent a powerful message to city officials.

Advertisement

“We showed them that we’re all together and we’re going to fight all the way to the end,” he said as councilors filed out of the room.

Wing said Monday that the city and the unions representing its police officers and public works employees remain at an impasse over the contract negotiations, and the Maine Labor Relations Board will have to bring in a mediator to try to remedy the situation.

Although the union representing Biddeford’s firefighters had refused to meet with the city, citing the current lack of a fire chief and other circumstances, Casavant said he was notified Tuesday afternoon that the firefighters’ union would meet with the city sometime this month.

Professional Firefighters of Maine representative Gerry Gay predicted Tuesday that the nature of that meeting will be “intense,” but he hopes negotiations can still move forward.

“These are hard-working men and women who provide great service to the city and to demoralize the existing contracts is terrible,” said Gay. “There’s a lot of stuff going on in the city, and we need to just get back to the table and straighten this stuff out. That’s our goal.”

— Staff Writer Angelo J. Verzoni can be contacted at 282-1535, ext. 329 or averzoni@journaltribune.com.


Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.