WATERBORO — Those who wish to cast a vote on the proposed $39.1 million RSU 57 budget for the coming year may do so at a district meeting set for 7 p.m. Tuesday. Those casting ballots must be registered voters and may check in with ballot clerks starting at 6:15 p.m. Tuesday’s meeting will be held at Massabesic High School cafeteria on West Road.
The budget as proposed is about $1.2 million more than this year. Much of the increase about $866,000 ”“ is in instruction costs.
The local portion of the increase is $540,361, about $60,000 less than earlier projections.
If passed as proposed, property owners in the district will see increases. The rise in taxes for someone with a home valued at $200,000 would be $27.84 in Alfred, $35.04 in Limerick, $54 in Lyman, $66 in Newfield, $45.84 in Shapleigh and $56.88 in Waterboro.
According to information released by the district, about 58 percent of the budget comes from local assessments; slightly more than 36 percent from state subsidies, about 4.75 percent from leftover balances, slightly less than 1 percent from non-tax revenues and the remainder from adult education non-tax revenues.
Almost 75 percent of the cost of education goes to salaries and benefits; with the rest to energy, other utilities, equipment repairs and maintenance, supplies and more.
In the 2013-14 school year, RSU 57 paid $10,777 in costs per pupil, below the state average of $12,000 and well below Acton, which spent about $15,500 per pupil that year.
Most of the voting Tuesday will be by a show of hands, though some require paper ballots. In that case, voting will be supervised by the ballot clerks.
Tuesday’s article-by-article vote is the first of two opportunities for voters to cast ballots. Voters cast an up or down validation vote on the entire plan June 9.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 324-4444 (local call in Sanford) or 282-1535, ext. 327 or twells@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less