WATERBORO — Folks with questions about a plan to renovate the athletic fields and make other improvements at the Massabesic High School complex can get answers Wednesday at a 6:30 p.m. public hearing at the high school auditorium on West Road.
Whether to approve a $3.1 million bond for the $3.9 million overall project will be decided by voters in the six-town district June 9.
It is a scaled back plan from an earlier, more costly version rejected by voters in November.
The remaining $800,000 of the cost would come from capital funds, grants and donations.
The project includes: Resurfacing the track, which proponents say is currently not able to be used for competition due to deterioration; widening the football field to accommodate soccer, field hockey, and other field sports and adding greater assess to the lighted competition area; installing permanent bleachers; providing overdue maintenance of the tennis courts and adding bathroom and storage facilities. The prior effort that failed at the polls would have cost a total of about $6.8 million, with $4.9 million to be bonded. It was a more ambitious proposal that included new tennis courts, parking, a new maintenance facility and more.
RSU 57 educates students in Alfred, Limerick, Lyman, Newfield, Shapleigh and Waterboro.
After last November’s failed vote the School Board and administration took a step back to review the process. The Athletic Boosters then came forward to promote a revised plan, said School Board Chairman Karla Bergeron in a prior interview.
The field and other infrastructure has not had a facelift since they were constructed in the 1970s, according to Activities Director Brandon Scully.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 324-4444 (local call in Sanford) or 282-1535, ext. 327 or twells@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less