AMHERST, Mass. (AP) — The University of Massachusetts at Amherst said Wednesday that it has reversed its decision to ban Iranian nationals from admission to certain graduate programs in engineering and science.
The announcement comes on the heels of the university’s controversial decision last week to bar Iranian students. Officials said then that the move aligned school policy with U.S. sanctions against Iran but said Wednesday it has since consulted further with the State Department and private attorneys.
“We have always believed that excluding students from admission conflicts with our institutional values and principles. It is now clear, after further consultation and deliberation, that we can adopt a less restrictive policy,” said Michael Malone, vice chancellor for research and engagement.
The university said it will develop individualized study plans based on a student’s projected coursework to meet the requirements of federal sanctions law.
Congress enacted legislation in August 2012 that denies visas for Iranian citizens to study in the U.S. if they plan to participate in coursework for a career in the energy or nuclear fields in Iran.
“We had a conversation with UMass Amherst about their decision,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Wednesday. “And also conveyed that U.S. law does not prohibit qualified Iranian nationals coming to the United States for education in science and engineering.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less