Excerpts from recent editorials in newspapers in the United States and abroad:
The Providence (R.I.) Journal, June 20, on thalidomide:
In the 1960s, thousands of babies were born with severe deformities because the drug thalidomide was prescribed to their mothers to treat nausea associated with pregnancy, or morning sickness. It was a tragedy and a scandal, especially because the medical profession could not explain how the drug actually worked. It seemed to help and so was prescribed, but no one apparently considered the possible side effects.
Fifty years later, researchers in Japan and the United States have made discoveries about thalidomide and possibly more potent derivatives and what they can do to halt the growth of certain classes of cancer cells in the body, the so-called B-cell malignancies, that may go a long way toward erasing the drug’s terrible reputation. The cancers include multiple myeloma, a kind of leukemia, and some lymphomas. Because it also suppresses the immune system, lupus may also be a candidate for treatment with thalidomide derivatives.
The Japanese scientists discovered that the drugs work by binding to proteins called transcription factors that give signals for cellular growth. Many cancers are the result of overactive transcription factors, switches that stop switching off. These proteins are also responsible for normal limb development of babies in the womb. In the case of multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, a powerful derivative of thalidomide, killed multiple myeloma cells in the laboratory.
According to Dr. William Kaelin Jr., of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, in Boston, this ability “could be a template for targeting other transcription factors linked to cancer.” That would be ironic indeed.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less