PORTLAND (AP) — Maine’s moose population remains strong while New Hampshire’s is waning.
Both states are using GPS monitoring collars to track and study their moose populations.
Lee Kantar ”“ Maine’s moose biologist ”“ tells the Bangor Daily News that the state’s moose population is staying pretty strong and healthy.
In New Hampshire, wildlife biologists say winter ticks are weakening the state’s herd, with many dying of anemia due to blood loss. New Hampshire’s moose population had dropped by 3,000 in recent years, and now stands at about 4,500.
Biologists say colder temperatures throughout much of Maine in winter are sparing most deer there from the threat of tick infestation.
New Hampshire wildlife biologist Kristine Rines says climate change and warmer winters have escalated the winter tick problem in her state.
“You can get 100,000 ticks on a moose,” Rines said. In addition to anemia, Rines said, the moose also become vulnerable to hypothermia.
Maine biologists in the next few months plan to fit up to 70 moose with GPS collars, and plan to collar another 70 moose next winter, Kantar said.
“We have initiated a GPS telemetry study to examine adult female and calf survival rates in western Maine and plan to follow in northern Maine next year,” Kantar said.
Moose hunting has been suspended in Minnesota, which is experiencing a 25 percent drop in moose population each year.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less