TOPSHAM Topsham voters will consider endorsing an $8.47 million 2013-14 municipal budget Wednesday. The proposed municipal budget is up $388,779 — or 4.8 percent — over the current year. The town faces an estimated School Administrative District 75 budget share of $7.9 million and a $1.4 million share of the Sagadahoc County budget — increases of $388,790 and $39,959, respectively. If all budgets are adopted as proposed, and the town receives approximately as much revenue sharing as this year and retains current valuation, residents could be see a property tax rise of 3.8 percent, from $16.21 to $16.83 of $1,000 assessed value. The town has budgeted for a school resource officer position at Mt. Ararat High School, which it would share the cost of with SAD 75. Officials have included funds to replace a 20-yearold sweeper machine; and seek $10,000 for the Topsham Community Fund for the Androscoggin Bike Path project. Voters will consider accepting Serenity Lane as a public road and consider ordinance amendments to clarify the Planning Board appeals process; amend the permit fee schedule; rezone property along U.S. Route 201 to allow limited commercial uses; clarify rules of parks and trails; and add commercial food processing facilities to the town’s list of regulated uses. Topsham Town Meeting WHEN: 7 p.m. Wednesday
WHERE: Mt. Ararat High School
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less