
In response to requests from lawmakers, Bowen developed the frame of a program that would treat charter schools the same as any other school district within the state’s funding formula.
Currently, charter schools receive public tax dollars from their students’ sending districts, which are required to contribute a per-student amount to the charter school based on the state’s Essential Programs and Services program. That means traditional public school districts that lose students to charter schools end up losing more funding than districts that do not.
The concept introduced by Bowen would spread the cost of charter schools across every school district in the state, minimizing the impact on individual schools in favor of having everyone pay a lower amount. Individual schools would still be affected in the long term because their subsidies would shrink along with their student enrollments, said Bowen.
“It would work just as if they were school districts,” said Bowen. “They would get state subsidy from us just as school districts do. … You’re not going to have a disproport ionate impact on any single district. This is a state-level initiative.”
Opponents of charter schools have long argued charter schools hurt nearby public schools because they divert funding from necessary local programs. They have advocated for a dedicated funding stream outside General Purpose Aid for education, which represents the bulk of state funding for public schools.
One case in point is Regional School Unit 54 in the Skowhegan area, which last fall had two charter schools open nearby, the Maine Academy of Natural Sciences in Fairfield and the Cornville Regional Charter School in Cornville.
RSU 54 Superintendent Brent Colbry has said his district lost 50 students and $455,000 to the charter schools this year and expects more than $600,000 could go to the charter schools next year.
Though legislators reacted warmly to Bowen’s concept, some said there is more work to be done before trying to implement it.
Rep. Bruce MacDonald, DBoothbay, co-chairman of the Education Committee, said it was a good starting concept.
“Though I have some questions and concerns about it, it does represent to me an interesting initiative and a chance for us to work together on a solution,” said MacDonald. “I do feel that we’re beginning to set the table around something which we will be able to reach a good compromise.”
Rep. Brian Hubbell, D-Bar Harbor, agreed.
“I think this is a really promising idea,” he said.
Bowen said there were some problems that would have to work out, including the flow of funding in the first years after the law’s application and how to deal with special education funding, but that this idea was the easiest way to alter the formula.
However, he said it would be difficult to implement the new formula in time for the coming school year.
“The goal here was ‘Let’s not reinvent the wheel,” said Bowen. “This is taking advantage of existing structures.”
There was some hesitation. “I am a little worried about unintended consequences of doing something like this,” said Rep. Peter Johnson, RGreenville.
The Education Committee is considering numerous bills related to charter schools and their funding.
The committee took no action on Bowen’s presentation Tuesday and were moving toward writing a committee bill that incorporates a range of ideas.
FOR MORE, see the Bangor Daily News at bangordailynews.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less