WOOLWICH
Time is getting short if town officials want to give residents options for improvements to the Municipal Building, and they know it.
During Wednesday night’s meeting, the Selectboard will schedule a workshop with the Building Committee, which has been working diligently on renovation options for many months. The annual town meeting, on May 8, is not that far away, and articles for the warrant must be settled.
“We’re getting down to crunch time now,” Selectboard Chairman David King said today.
In separate written and oral surveys, residents have shown differing levels of support for two renovation/enlargement proposals — or none at all. Plan A calls for an enlarged public meeting space, a new fire bay and other improvements, at a price tag of $850,000. Plan A, for $1 million, would allow for an even larger public meeting space that could accommodate community functions.
King said the town should include both options on the town warrant. But it also should have a backup plan, he said.
“We’d just like to have an a-la-carte menu with what each items costs,” he said.
King emphasized the need for some type of improvement at the Municipal Building, which is cramped and not up to code.
“We’ve outlived the usefulness of that building,” he said. “It’s a big, uninsulated garage.”
Wedneday’s meeting begins at 4 p.m., with an executive session regarding a committee appointment.
After a budget workshop from 5 to 6, the Selectboard will vote on a new member of the Shellfish Committee.
King said committee members have settled down since division and disagreements regarding stewardship of the town’s clam flats surfaced last month. The Selectboard and the Shellfish Committee met last week.
“It was a very productive meeting,” he said. “They ironed out a lot of differences. They all want the same thing. They’re just saying it differently. They all want to protect the (clam) flats.”
King said there are two or three applicants for a position on the committee. Presently, he said, there are three clam diggers and three landowners on the panel.
“I think someone with a background in the industry would be good,” he said. “I can’t see loading up the committee with landowners.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less