To the editor:
State Rep. Seth Berry and the rest of the Democrats are looking at the welfare mess they created in Maine through rose-colored glasses and trying to put a positive spin onit.
They are nitpicking the governor’s comments on welfare recipients versus the number of people paying taxes. I took it as he meant it, that the number of people paying income taxes is less than the number of people on welfare and receiving social services in Maine.
Under Gov. “Welfare Is my Middle Name” Baldacci, the number of people receiving these services in Maine exploded. We had the specter of thousands of immigrants flocking into the cities of Portland and Lewiston.
They did not come from their home countries, but from other states where their welfare benefits were set to expire. They came to Maine for the welfare and social services the state offers.
Despite what Department of Health and Human Services officials and Democratic legislators say, people do come to Maine to receive these services.
The problems caused by Maine becoming a welfare state were shown when the stimulus money arrived here. Instead of using the money for bridge and highway maintenance, which would have put thousands of people to work, it was used to cover the budget hole in the DHHS budget caused by all the welfare and social service spending.
The bottom line in Maine is that there are not enough people paying income taxes to cover all of those receiving welfare and social services.
Raymond T. West
Topsham
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less