It has been said that “the fewer the words, the stronger the message.” In the normal course of a conversation, that saying may be most appropriate. When it comes to news reporting, it appears that so-called journalists have taken that saying to a whole new level. They’re not saying anything at all.
The decision to omit reporting on recent major stories such as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s accusation of treason by the Obama administration in 2016 illustrates the cowardly direction this paper has taken. There are those who only get information from your paper. This explains why we have so many “low-information” voters.
Michael McClure
Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less