Citizens are struggling to understand why the town of Bridgton has a land use code in place that puts hundreds of residents in the path of Particulate Matter 2.5 that is not visible to the naked eye, and is known to cause silicosis, and aggravate heart, lung, COPD and asthma conditions. The EPA recognizes and continues to strengthen its air quality standards in accordance with the Clean Air Act, to protect Americans from this harmful pollution and its costly health impacts.
The current ordinance allows extractive mining (quarries) complete with blasting and rock crushing in an area adjacent to hundreds of residences. Low-impact commercial uses would be acceptable, but blasting and daily rock crushing at a quarry off Route 302 that sends plumes of PM 2.5 to nearby neighborhoods and visitors to Pleasant Mountain and Moose Pond should not be acceptable. How can the town justify exposing any person to these health dangers? What is of more importance, people’s health or the slightly lower cost of rocks?
In addition to the health implications there is potential for damage to home foundations and wells in the area. The taxpayers will end up footing the bill for their health care and the cost of home repairs. This does not feel right. Business profits and the town sees growth, but the locals pay more than their fair share.
Check your LUC and engage your town and state representatives to ensure that you will not be caught by surprise.
June Sleeper
Bridgton
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less