Cumberland residents are being asked whether the town should build affordable housing on land formerly owned by Elizabeth Drowne. The town obtained the land when it accepted an offer in the will of Mrs. Drowne in 1892. The intent of her offer was to have the property benefit education and required that the land never be sold, and that income from the property go to the school.
To uphold the conditions of acceptance, the town should have conserved the property in a trust. Unfortunately, the town did not. Then, in 1957, because the property was not in a trust, a judge ruled that the town no longer had to abide by the conditions that were agreed upon when it took possession of the property.
Now it’s up to us to decide. Do we honor what we agreed to when we accepted the land? If so, vote “no” on the referendum.
John Jensenius
Cumberland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less