I am writing to express my anger with Portland’s establishment politicians regarding their targeting of recently elected Charter Commissioner Nasreen Sheikh-Yousef.
Mayor Kate Snyder and Councilor Spencer Thibodeau, both of whom purportedly believe Black Lives Matter, have used their positions to attack a working-class Somali-American activist for unapologetically opposing white supremacy and continuing to fight for Black lives (and by extension, the lives of all marginalized people).
Sheikh-Yousef was resoundingly chosen by voters because of her outspoken defense of the dispossessed, and I hope she will continue this fight while in elected office. As a historian, I have written about this; as lifelong working-class Portlanders, my family has experienced its cruelty firsthand. As we know, the current system was established in 1923 by the city’s wealthiest people with the support of thousands of bigots in the Ku Klux Klan. Since then, marginalized people have been systematically discriminated against by the city’s economic and political elites.
Whether it was the city manager authorizing violence to stop striking workers in 1937 or “urban renewal” destroying many of the city’s working-class neighborhoods in the 1960s and early ’70s, the current system has long governed for the benefit of the rich and powerful. Thus, the legacy of the chamber-Klan partnership goes far deeper than just one election. Unfortunately, political elites have chosen to continue this tradition by attacking Sheikh-Yousef. By doing so, the pair have proven why she is correct. Both the establishment politicians and the lawyers who enrich themselves off of the current system, as well as the system itself, need to go.
Tom MacMillan
Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less