While Maine has led the way in election reform with clean elections and ranked-choice voting, we’re behind the times when it comes to corporations and campaign contributions. It’s time for Maine to join the 22 other states who ban direct contributions from corporations to candidates and to candidate political action committees.
In Maine, corporations can give money directly to candidates running for state office. They do this because they understand that policies created in Augusta can affect their bottom line. And they do this because they hope to influence legislators who put those policies in place. It’s that simple. And is potentially corrupting.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld that state’s corporate ban in 2018 stating, “Experience confirms that if corporate contributions were allowed, there would be a serious threat of quid pro quo corruption” (Brennan Center for Justice, June 5, 2019, “The Supreme Court Nixes Corporate Contributions for 2020 Campaign”).
Corporations have plenty of other ways to play a role in electoral politics beyond contributing directly to candidates. Through entities called “super PACs” corporations can promote certain policy positions and candidates as long as there’s no direct coordination with a candidate’s campaign apparatus.
We’re in luck now because Sen. Louie Luchini of Hancock County has introduced a bill that would ban corporate contributions made directly to candidates. It’s past time for Maine to join states across the country and across the political spectrum and ban direct-to-candidate contributions from corporations.
Please ask your senator and representative to support Sen. Luchini’s bill and help restore democracy by and for the people.
Mary Ann Larson
Cumberland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less