BOSTON — A Massachusetts trooper led fellow officers on a chase and had to be subdued, another took cash under the table for unauthorized police escorts for funeral processions and yet another partied in Las Vegas with people connected to organized crime.
None of them were fired.
The Boston Globe reported Sunday that its review of internal affairs files shows troopers are rarely fired, almost no matter what they have done.
All told, dozens of troopers who are still on the force despite having broken the law collectively have 29 sustained charges for assault and battery; 19 alcohol and drug violations, including four drunken driving arrests; 17 charges for harassment, including three for sexual harassment; and another 17 for improperly using the state’s criminal background check system, the Globe reported.
The office of Middlesex District Attorney Marian Ryan, whose jurisdiction covers State Police headquarters and other barracks, said it has not received a referral from State Police since she took office in 2013.
A spokesperson for Attorney General Maura Healey called the information “highly concerning” and said it “erodes public trust” in law enforcement.
State Police Col. Christopher Mason declined to discuss the Globe’s review of internal investigations. Recordkeeping on internal investigations was sloppy and incomplete, and the records themselves closely guarded from public view, the newspaper reported.
Former Massachusetts inspector general Gregory Sullivan said there should be no double standard “that allows police officers to get away with alleged criminal activity by virtue of the supervisors and administrators keeping it secret.”
“That is plain wrong. It’s a disservice to the public and it’s unfair,” he said.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less