Why am I voting No on 1 on March 3? Growing up in a family of eight, whatever my siblings brought home, we all got. Whooping cough? Check. Measles? Check. Mumps? Check. Chickenpox? Check. My parents couldn’t always afford to take us to the doctor, so I spent nights over a pot of steaming water to control my cough and days lying feverish in the bed I shared with my sister. My family would have been thrilled to receive vaccinations for these diseases so my parents wouldn’t have missed work and so we kids wouldn’t have suffered for weeks.
When I started teaching in 1974, I was thankful my students were able to get more immunizations than I could growing up. It kept our schools and community as healthy as possible. Towards the end of my career, I was dismayed to see the exemption rate for vaccines increase significantly. Did you know Maine now has the fourth highest rate of opt-outs nationally? High rates of immunity in schools help prevent the spread of illness throughout communities so that those who are unable to get vaccinated stay protected and kids don’t go through having these diseases like I did.
As a retired Maine teacher and grandmother of four, I believe children deserve the opportunity to attend school; this law doesn’t impede that. It does require that schools are safe from vaccine-preventable diseases so that all children can attend.
Please join me in voting No on 1 to protect Maine kids.
Linda Cote
Falmouth
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less