I read Gary Anderson’s commentary in the Friday, Jan. 17, edition of The Times Record, “Solving Bath’s Rabies Outbreak.”
After giving thought numerous times to the rabies dilemma, I realized too much of the natural environment has been used for development. This decreases the environment for foxes to roam and live as well as other animals.
With increased development, there is increased human population and activity which, again, reduces the area foxes can live and roam as well as other animals, as well as decreasing much-needed trees and the potential for disturbing the ecosystem.
Less human population and human development will not necessarily reduce the number of foxes that get rabies, however, there would be less contact with humans by foxes.
Encroachment by humans has caused numerous environmental problems that affect foxes and other animals as well as plant life, water systems and so forth.
Rabies is a serious problem, however, this outbreak might give us reason to stop and contemplate how we humans live and how we think and perhaps we should use some foresight on this activity that we call development.
Joseph Ciarrocca,
Brunswick
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less