
Rep. Mike Michaud announced late Thursday that he would not run for the U.S. Senate seat now held by Olympia Snowe and instead would focus on seeking re-election to the U.S. House.
Maine Senate President Kevin Raye, who has taken out nomination papers to run against Michaud for Maine’s 2nd District seat, announced this morning that he would not seek his party’s nomination for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Snowe.
“I want to continue to represent the wonderful people of Maine’s 2nd District and keep working on the unique issues and challenges we face,” Michaud said in a statement sent out about 9 p.m. Thursday. “I am also very proud of what I have been able to accomplish on behalf of Maine’s and America’s veterans and that work must continue.”
“I join many Mainers in being frustrated with how Washington operates and believe that both sides of Capitol Hill have fallen into a partisan rut. However, I am proud of being able to work across the aisle to deliver results and I think, for now, I can best continue those efforts in the House.”
Michaud’s decision likely paves the way for one of two Democrats — U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree, who represents Maine’s 1st District, and former twoterm Gov. John Baldacci — who have both started gathering signatures for the Senate race.
His decision also could help determine which Republicans or independents decide to enter the race.
As Michaud, Pingree and Baldacci wasted little time in taking the first step to run for the U.S. Senate, state Republicans appeared to be exercising caution in that race.
Many top-tier GOP names are being discussed but they had not officially begun gathering signatures as of late Thursday, according to elections officials. Neither have prominent independents such as former Gov. Angus King or Eliot Cutler.
Party candidates have until March 15 to turn in 2,000 signatures to run for the seat unexpectedly being given up by Snowe.
So what are Republicans waiting for?
“ Republicans are more thoughtful in our policies and our politics,” said Brent Littlefield, a GOP strategist and a senior adviser to Gov. Paul LePage.
University of Maine political scientist Mark Brewer said there is more to it than that.
“For the big-name Democrats, they are all top-tier candidates. There isn’t anyone on the Republican side with that kind of résumé,” Brewer said. “I think part of the reason why all three (Democrats) came out early was: they wanted to make it clear to voters and Democratic activists that they were all interested. For the Republicans, I think it makes sense for them to wait a little bit.”
One Republican candidate, Scott D’Amboise, is in the Senate race already, but the reality is that other Republicans could be gathering signatures quietly already.
Megan Sanborn, spokeswoman for the Secretary of State’s Office, said Thursday that candidates can request blank petitions or print petitions online and begin gathering signatures. In that instance, the secretary of state would not know the identity of a candidate until signatures are turned in.
“It’s certainly hard for us to know exactly who is gathering signatures at this point and we may not know until March 15,” Sanborn said.
That means the already long list of candidates for the Senate, and also for Maine’s two U.S. House seats, could be even longer.
A handful of Democrats — House Minority Leader Emily Cain, former Secretary of State Matt Dunlap and former state senator Bruce Bryant — all took out papers this week to explore a run for the 2nd District seat. It’s not clear if any or all will remain in the race in light of Michaud’s decision.
On the Republican side, Maine GOP chairman Charlie Webster said his party’s leaders are having a lot of discussions about potential candidates but he wasn’t ready to identify anybody just yet.
“My opinion is that it will be a three-way race,” he said. “It will be one of the liberals and I think (former two-term independent Gov. Angus) King will run. That means we need to come to an agreement to bring someone that would be different than those two.”
A candidate cannot run for a House seat and Senate seat at the same time in Maine, according to Julie Flynn with the Secretary of State’s Office. In other words, if Pingree decided by March 15 to officially enter the Senate race, she would not be able to run for re- election in the House should she lose in a Senate primary.
Brewer said Thursday — before Michaud’s late announcement — that he would be surprised if both Pingree and Michaud stayed in the race. He also said he thought Michaud was the strongest Democratic candidate for the Senate.
“He’s popular in his district and I don’t think his lack of name recognition in the 1st District hurts him because he’s still a Democrat,” Brewer said. “A lot of people think Pingree is the front-runner, but I think she’s the weakest of the three. I can’t see her having an easy time getting support in the 2nd District.”
As for Baldacci, Brewer said, “He has a nice résumé and he’s won a lot of campaigns but there are still some lingering negatives from his time as governor.”
Another question that has been posed is whether candidates who were gathering signatures to run for the Senate could use those same signatures to run for the House, or vice versa. Flynn said that’s not allowed.
That means someone who has gathered the necessary signatures to run for the House would have to start from scratch if interested in running for the Senate.
The other big unknown in the Senate race could be independent candidates, specifically King and Cutler, who finished a close second to Gov. Paul LePage in the 2010 gubernatorial election.
“I think King is stronger than Cutler,” Brewer said. “There are plenty of people who look back fondly on King and have wondered why he didn’t try to do something else.”
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS contributed to this report. For more, see the Bangor Daily News at bangordailynews.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less