Regional School Unit 1 is “behind the 8-ball” regarding a new cost-sharing formula for its five-member towns, the chairman of the board of directors said on Monday night.
Tim Harkins was referring to a cost-sharing formula that has been the subject of debate among the towns for some time.
RSU 1 devised a one-third, one-third, one-third plan based on each town’s population, students and valuation in 2007, just prior to the statemandated consolidation of schools. Shortly thereafter, RSU 1 changed the formula to suit some of its towns. But last April, the school unit reverted back to the onethird, or LD 910 method.
Now, Bath and Phippsburg are getting hit with higher payments into the school system.
Harkins said that, at this point, communities don’t feel they have enough information to make a new charge.
“It’s in the hands of attorneys to work on this,” Harkins said. “At the same time, the cost-sharing group has been working together. But we’re behind the 8-ball for a November referendum vote.”
Board member Alan Walton asked if a proposal by October would be soon enough to get it on the ballot, and Harkins answered, “it would be close. We have to meet religiously every other week.”
Jon Davis, town administrator in West Bath, recalled the time when the school board discarded the LD 910 method.
“Woolwich picked up on it, then more of the towns did the same,” Davis said. “West Bath was overcharged $1.9 million over the last four years.”
The unrest continues.
“Now other towns are unhappy,” Davis said. “That’s kind of where it’s at. We’re having meetings with the school board to see where we go from here.”
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less