WEST BATH
Declaring the cost-sharing formula once used by Regional School Unit 1 violated state law, the town of West Bath has filed suit in Sagadahoc County Superior Court seeking as much as $1.9 million in damages from the school unit.
Earlier this year, RSU 1 reverted to a formula that allocated school costs based one-third on student population, one-third on town valuation and one-third on student population.
West Bath’s lawsuit states the formula, which RSU 1 used to assess member towns in 2009-10, used a costsharing pllan that does not comply with an earlier formula required after the Legislature mandated school consolidation.
West Bath is fine with the current plan — which is under sharp scrutiny by at least three RSU 1 member towns — but says it has been overcharged by as much as $1.9 million.
“They’re trying to recover $1.9 million they feel they were overcharged over a four-year period,” said Tim Harkins, chairman of the RSU 1 Board of Directors.
West Bath Town Administrator Jonathan Davis said the town had sought mediation, to no avail.
“The RSU 1 attorney said no,” he said. “We filed suit to start the process. We’re pursuing some if not all of the money.
“This is kind of unfortunate where it’s at at this point.”
Harkins confirmed that Melissa Hewey, the school unit’s lawyer, recommended against mediation.
“We felt the best course of action would be to follow up with the case,” Harkins said.
West Bath has indicated it would go along with an RSU 1 plan to tax according to student population by 2015, but opposes that formula for the next fiscal year.
Sally J. Daggett is representing West Bath in the lawsuit, filed at the West Bath courthouse on Oct. 9.
lgrard@timesrecord.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less