MIDDLETOWN, Conn. — The Bowdoin College men’s tennis team closed its regular season with a pair of authoritative victories against Tufts and Wesleyan last weekend.
The Polar Bears finished their regular season with a record of 17-1, the best-ever regular season mark for the program, and will enter the NESCAC Tournament as the third-ranked team in Division III.
Bowdoin overwhelmed 18th-ranked Tufts in singles play to take a commanding 8-1 victory on Saturday in Medford, Massachusetts. The Polar Bears led 2-1 after doubles play thanks to wins from Kyle Wolfe/Jerry Jiang (8-4) and Gil Roddy/Larry Zhao (8-4). Bowdoin polished off the win with a sweep of singles play, winning all six matches by straight sets. The most impressive victories came from Luke Tercek (6-1, 6-2), Roddy (6-0, 6-4) and Justin Patel (6-2, 6-3) as Bowdoin coasted to the win.
Bowdoin duplicated its effort against 12th-ranked Wesleyan on Sunday, taking an 8-1 win in the exact same fashion. A 2-1 lead after doubles action, courtesy of wins from Tercek/Grant Urken (8- 5) and Wolfe/Jiang (8-3), was followed by a sweep of singles matches. A trio of straight-set wins sealed the deal, led by Wolfe (6-3, 6-2), Roddy (6-4, 7-6) and Patel (6- 4, 6-3).
The Polar Bears will play in the NESCAC Tournament this upcoming weekend at Amherst College. Seedings and pairings for the championship will be announced later today.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less