Yogi Berra’s famous comment, “It’s like déjà vu all over again,” immediately came to mind when I heard that the Kennebunk Board of Selectmen voted March 11 to put a question on the June ballot to ask voters to approve an amendment that would waive requirements to off-street parking standards for first-floor retail or restaurant space in the Lower Village.
Many Lower Village taxpayers had attended numerous public meetings last year to testify that the waiver provision should be allowed to expire and not be renewed. The waiver provision did go off into the sunset, although it had previously been extended for one year. The disastrous consequences and disruptions to the neighborhood when waivers were granted to eating establishments which did not have sufficient parking for patrons were overwhelmingly demonstrated.
Harry Falcone, that stalwart citizen monitor, rightly questioned why the planning board is trying to resurrect this waiver provision and bring it back to the voters. So here we go: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose (the more things change, the more they stay the same).
In discussing whether or not people will obey clearly marked parking spaces, planning board member Robert Metcalf said, “Well, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t necessarily make it drink. That is the same thing I’ve found with parking.”
That remark could equally apply to those public officials who once again are leading the taxpayers to the water, seeking approval of a waiver of parking clause from an unwilling public.
I hope that the citizens of Kennebunk are as smart as Metcalf’s horse when they enter the voting booth in June, and that they refuse to drink it ”“ once again.
Robert F. Lyons,
Kennebunk Lower Village
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less