AUGUSTA (AP) — Republican Gov. Paul LePage urged lawmakers to put aside “petty egos” and send him a budget on Sunday as a legislative panel sought common ground on a proposal promoted by House Republicans who torpedoed the previous spending bill.
LePage posted a Facebook video in which he chastised Republican Senate President Michael Thibodeau and Democratic House Speaker Sara Gideon.
“We were elected to serve 1.3 million people in the state of Maine — not shut down government for the press,” he said. “The time for delay is over.”
The governor’s comments did little to ease tension around the Statehouse, where many lawmakers blamed LePage and House Republicans for the shutdown.
The six-member budget-negotiating panel met behind closed doors for much of the day but began going through the proposal line by line Sunday evening in hopes of producing a state budget that can be voted on by the full House and Senate before the Fourth of July.
The revised budget contained $162 million in increased education spending to partially offset removal of a voter-approved 3 percent surcharge on income of wealthy Maine residents that was aimed to boosting state spending on K-12 education.
The panel voted late Sunday to keep a lodging tax increase but voted to delay implementation by a month to Nov. 1. LePage said he won’t sign a budget with a tax increase. But Thibodeau said eliminating of the surcharge more than made up for it.
With the state government shutdown in its second day, the session got off to a rocky start when Gideon scolded House Republicans for making changes to the latest proposal. Democrats have accused the governor and House Republicans of repeatedly changing their demands.
“I can barely contain my fury,” Gideon said.
Republicans assured her there would be no more changes.
“I don’t think there’s anything nefarious,” Republican Rep. Tom Winsor said.
Maine state government went into partial shutdown Saturday because of lawmakers’ failure to approve a new two-year budget.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less