SANFORD – Voters in Sanford approved the $53.9 million school budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1 and agreed to continue with the annual budget validation referendum. However, only a fraction of the city’s eligible voters turned out at the polls.
Voting was light in all three wards, and in the end, only 4 percent, or 630, of Sanford’s 14,321 registered voters cast ballots.
The school budget, of which $14.8 million is derived through property taxes, was approved 510 to 119 in unofficial tallies. There was one blank ballot.
As to continuing with the annual validation referendum, 421 voters said yes, and 206 said no. Three blank ballots were cast, according to City Clerk Sue Cote.
The spending plan includes cuts to school staff, including seven elementary and high school positions, a curriculum assistant, two education technicians, several part-time and stipend positions, and more. Also, some positions that are currently full-time are poised to become part-time.
During the school budget process, school department officials said that about 45 percent of the jobs proposed to be cut were currently filled. The remaining 55 percent of them are vacant or will be absorbed by retirements.
The budget also contains a handful of new positions, including an assistant principal and a math interventionist at the junior high/middle school, and an in-school suspension ed tech and a third shift custodian at Sanford High School and Regional Technical Center. Those positions add about $245,000 to the budget.
Additional expenses to the budget are in special education, where more students require out-of-district placement. School officials say they’re seeing an uptick in the number of students with severe needs.
In addition, salary increases for staff range from 2 to 3.25 percent.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 780-9016 or twells@journaltribune.com
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less