

A charge of felony arson was ordered continued until January by Biddeford District Court Judge Michael Duddy. If the boys comply with their probation and continue to do well, attorneys for the boys said the charge will be dismissed.

She said the fire quickly raged out of control.
Both Chmelecki and attorney Cory McKenna, who represented another of the boys, said their clients showed remorse for what they had done.
“It was truly an accident, said McKenna.
A portion of the two hearings was open to the news media and another portion, where the boys were questioned by the judge, was closed.
McKenna said his client showed a lot of remorse when speaking with the judge.
“He’s taken every step the state and his parents asked him to do,” said McKenna.
Fire roared through the rear tower of the vacant five-story former textile mill on River Street, known locally as Stenton Trust Mill, erupting just before 7 p.m. on June 23.
It quickly spread throughout the rear tower of the building and raged on through the night. Firefighters from 26 communities fought the blaze.
Chmelecki said her client, an eighth-grade student, has been cooperative and both he and his family have followed conditions set by the court, including taking part in counseling requirements, reporting regularly to his juvenile corrections case manager, following rules at home and school. She pointed out that he, like the others, had been on house arrest for a time.
She said restitution was not ordered for her client, because it is based on ability to pay.
Both boys have changed schools, and are doing well, their lawyers said.
As to the sentence, the attorneys said that the goal of the juvenile justice system is not punishment, but rehabilitation.
“The purpose was met here today,” said Chmelecki.
The third boy is scheduled to make his appearance at Biddeford District Court on Oct. 26.
Two of the boys were 13 years old when the fire broke out, a third was 12.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 324-4444 (local call in Sanford) or 282-1535, ext. 327 or twells@journaltribune.com.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less