
Lisbon voters once again overwhelmingly rejected the proposed 2025-26 school budget Tuesday by a 3-to-2 margin.
With 1,358 votes cast, the $21.2 million budget — the same amount proposed in June — lost 810-548.
The vote was slightly closer the second time with 60% casting a no vote. In June, 70% of voters rejected the budget, 724-312.
With residents seething over a potential 20% tax hike due to an accounting error with the municipal budget, voters only had one place in June to show their unhappiness with the entire process.
While dozens of town residents packed the Town Council chamber for the past few months, outraged by the anticipated 18.6% tax increase from the municipal budget, school and county taxes and the water department, parents were equally passionate about not cutting the school budget when they filled the School Committee meeting following the no vote.

Instead of making a few cuts to demonstrate goodwill, the committee and the Town Council voted to send the same budget back to voters, believing the electorate would judge it this time on its own merits.
According to statute, the School Department will have to operate under last year’s budget, which is $598,966 less than what failed Tuesday.

Superintendent Richard Green outlined where some of those cuts could come from at last week’s School Committee meeting.
Green said, “$600,000 doesn’t come from pencils and paper. It comes from programs and services.”
He said his options on where to cut are limited and some could prove unpopular. Cutting contractual obligations requires a 90-day notice, which would extend employment into the school year before those positions can be eliminated. That makes cuts here unlikely.
Some professional services that could be trimmed include adult education, some co-curricular positions that are vacant, cleaning and mowing services and perhaps one of the two school resource officers, which could be controversial. The Jobs for Maine Graduates program could also be eliminated. Green also said he would likely establish a hard freeze on spending.
With this latest rejection, the group opposing the budgets is now turning its attention to changing the charter to allow residents to vote on the municipal budget as they do now with the school budget.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less