A Scarborough legislator introduced a bill to require private insurance carriers to cover the cost of blood serum testing for PFAS on March 4. Sen. Stacy Brenner, D-Scarborough, introduced LD 582, “An Act to Require Health Insurance Carriers to Provide Coverage for Blood Testing for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances,” which was the subject of a public hearing before the Joint Standing Committee on Health Coverage, Insurance and Financial Services.
“People deserve to know whether they’ve been exposed to forever chemicals and cost should never be a barrier against testing,” Brenner said. “One thing is abundantly clear — early detection saves lives. We owe it to individuals and families impacted by exposure to PFAS to help monitor their long-term health so treatments can be offered in a timely and effective manner if needed.”
This legislation would ensure that blood serum testing for PFAS is accessible to all Mainers. Blood serum tests cost between $450-$600. Many members of PFAS-affected communities are unable to afford the potentially life-saving testing. LD 582 would require all health plans offered in Maine that are renewed by or beginning on Jan. 1 to cover blood serum testing for PFAS.
Forever chemicals can lead to numerous health conditions such as kidney cancer, elevated cholesterol and reduced infant birthweight. There is currently no method to remove PFAS from the blood of affected individuals. Blood serum testing allows patients to identify and mitigate on-going exposure, and enables clinicians to identify related illnesses early.
LD 582 faces further action in committee.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less