As a lifelong female athlete and former athletic scholarship recipient, I want to express my agreement with Tom Moyer’s recent letter in the Kennebunk Post advocating for policies consistent with Title IX, which was enacted in 1972.
I personally benefited from Title IX nearly a decade after its passage, earning a partial athletic scholarship for collegiate cross country. Through my years of competition, I quickly learned a fundamental truth: in my sport — running — women and men do not compete on an equal physical playing field.
Men have inherent physiological advantages, including greater lung capacity and muscle mass, which make them naturally faster. A woman will never hold the title of fastest marathon time over a man — just look at the historic achievement of our own Joan Benoit, who won the first women’s Olympic marathon. Despite her incredible talent, the winning men’s time in that same Olympics was significantly faster — and always will be.
I am deeply grateful for the opportunities Title IX provided me, allowing me to help fund my education and achieve success in my sport. Competing within the women’s category gave me a fair chance to excel, to be recognized, and to compete safely.
We must return to common sense and truth — protecting female athletes by ensuring they compete within their own category. Doing so not only upholds the law, but also safeguards the integrity of women’s sports, avoiding the legal and social consequences that will inevitably follow if we continue down a path of gender confusion.
Let’s stand up for fairness, safety, and the future of women’s athletics.
Elizabeth Jordan
Kennebunkport
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less